🔗 Share this article

Twelve months back, the situation was entirely different. Ahead of the American presidential vote, reflective Americans could recognize America's serious imperfections – its inequities and inequality – however they still could see it as the United States. A democratic nation. A country where the rule of law carried weight. A state led by a respectable and decent leader, notwithstanding his older age and growing weakness.

Currently, as October 2025 ends, many of us hardly identify the country we inhabit. People alleged as illegal immigrants are detained and shoved into vans, sometimes denied due process. The eastern section of the “people’s house” – is being destroyed to build a lavish ballroom. The leader is targeting his political rivals or perceived antagonists and insisting the justice department transfer a huge total of citizen dollars. Uniformed troops are deployed across metropolitan centers under fabricated reasons. The military command, relabeled the Department of War, has practically freed itself of regular press examination while it uses what could amount to almost one trillion dollars in public funds. Colleges, legal practices, journalism organizations are yielding from leader's menaces, and wealthy elites are handled as nobility.

“America, only a few months ahead of its 250-year mark as the globe's top democratic nation, has tipped over the limit toward dictatorship and extremism,” Garrett Graff, commented this past summer. “In the end, faster than I thought feasible, it did happen here.”

One awakes amid recent atrocities. And it is hard to comprehend – and distressing to accept – how deeply lost we are, and the speed at which it has happened.

Nevertheless, we know that Trump was duly elected. Despite his profoundly alarming previous administration and following the alerts that came with the understanding of Project 2025 – even after the president personally declared plainly he planned to be a dictator solely at the start – sufficient voters chose him over his Democratic opponent.

Frightening as the present situation are, it's more daunting to understand that we are just nine months into this presidential term. Where will another 36 months of this downfall leave us? And suppose the three years turns into an prolonged era, because there is no one to restrain this ruler from opting that another term is necessary, perhaps for national security reasons?

Granted, there is still hope. There are legislative votes the coming year that could establish an alternate governmental control, should Democrats regain the Senate or House of Congress. There are public servants who are striving to exert some accountability, for example lawmakers currently launching an investigation into the attempted fund seizure by federal prosecutors.

And a national vote in the next cycle could start the path toward restoration exactly as last year’s election put us on this regrettable path.

We see millions of Americans demonstrating in urban areas of their cities, like they performed in the past days in the No Kings rallies.

Robert Reich, stated lately that “the dormant powerhouse of America is awakening”, just as it did post-McCarthyism in that decade or amid the Vietnam war protests or throughout the seventies crisis.

In those instances, the listing ship eventually was righted.

He claims he knows the signs of that resurgence and observes it occurring now. As evidence, he references the widespread marches, the widespread, multi-faction opposition against a television host's removal and the almost universal defiance by media to agree to government requirements they report only what is sanctioned.

“The sleeping giant perpetually exists dormant till certain corruption grows too toxic, some action so offensive of the common good, specific cruelty so noisy, that it has no choice other than to stir.”

It's a hopeful perspective, and I value Reich’s experienced view. Possibly he may turn out correct.

At the same time, the crucial issues endure: can America ever recover? Is it possible to restore its status in the world and its adherence to legal principles?

Or should we recognize that the 250-year-old experiment succeeded temporarily, and then – abruptly, completely – collapsed?

My negative thoughts indicates that the final scenario is correct; that all may indeed be finished. My hopeful heart, though, advises me that we have to attempt, through all methods available.

Personally, working in journalism analysis, that means encouraging reporters to adhere, more fully, to their mission of scrutinizing authority. For some people, it may be engaging with political races, or coordinating protests, or discovering methods to protect voting rights.

Less than a year ago, we were in a very different place. In the future? Or in several years? The reality is, we cannot predict. All we can do is to strive to not give up.

What Provides Me Optimism Currently

The engagement I experience in the classroom with aspiring reporters, who are both idealistic and realistic, {always